Would you be willing to install an elevator if you live on the sixth floor? Would you be willing to install an elevator if you live on the first floor? In recent years, the conflicts caused by the installation of elevators in old residential areas have often been in the news. Both supporters and opponents have tried to use their tragic situation to persuade each other to compromise, with some ending in discord, some shaking hands, and some fighting fiercely. The reason is that neither side can reasonably resolve the issue based on existing regulations. It seems that we have not yet legislated to stipulate who should compromise with whom, but later the government introduced a relatively compromise solution. If we want to install elevators, we must obtain the consent of the entire building's owners. The introduction of this regulation only solves the basic framework, and the fundamental point is still not resolved, such as how much the beneficiary should bear after installing elevators, such as the purchase of elevators, installation and maintenance costs, and then the losing party. There is no standard or guidance on how much compensation should be received, I don't know if other cities have it, but we don't have it here.
Let me first explain the basic process of installing elevators. Firstly, the initiator drafts an agreement that outlines the cost of installing the elevator, the brand to be installed, when to install it, and most importantly, how much each household will pay. The signature is signed and confirmed by all owners, and then submitted to the property management, community, or street office for approval. Often, if there are problems, it is signed and signed by those on the first and second floors who do not agree. Can they choose not to agree? Of course, they can! This is similar to your 7-day no reason return on Taobao, because the government has given him this right. The reason for not agreeing is that they are the losing party, that is, they have not enjoyed the dividends and have to pay the price. This is something that many people cannot see or pretend not to see. Seeing this, everyone may think that I am standing for them. First of all, my home is on the 5th floor and there is no elevator. I don't want to say that I am on that side now, but I firmly support one of them. Let me carefully analyze the impact of installing an elevator in a building on everyone. It can be divided into two directions: high-rise and ground floor. High rise residents are the beneficiaries, and they don't have to climb the floor. The house will appreciate in value, while ground floor residents will have their light blocked every day. The noise from the elevator and the most crucial factor is that the house will depreciate in value.
Because the government has not issued relevant compensation regulations, and high-rise residents are not willing to compensate them, they also attempt to use morality to condemn them. For example, if my family has elderly people and children, and the owners of their units have agreed, why don't you agree? Such words are just trying to obtain the maximum benefit at the lowest cost. I won't pretend to be the one who stands up now. I firmly support the bottom floor residents. The reason is simple. Installing elevators is harmful to the bottom floor without any benefit. Please don't say anything about your family having elderly people and children. For the sake of your elderly and children, I will have to endure noise pollution and no sunlight for the next few decades or even a lifetime? Although my words may not be very positive, I really want to say that I am speaking from the most fundamental perspective of human nature. After all, we live in reality, not a vague Noah's Ark. Your so-called positive energy is just a tool to whitewash oneself and condemn others. It is as ridiculous as someone at XXTV who regards patriotism as work and America as life, and an American mother educating Chinese children to love China!
The most unbearable thing is: why don't you agree when all the unit owners agree? This is as shameless as buying a house and asking the developer for a refund when the house price drops. I will do whatever they do? As long as it benefits you, try to raise it as high as possible, and as long as it doesn't benefit you, step on it crazily. Okay, today's wording is a bit sharp. After saying so much, there must be a solution in the end. I have an immature suggestion to share with everyone. Let's first talk about the cost of installing the elevator: including purchasing the elevator, installing it, and maintaining it in the later stage. It is generally divided into three parts according to the floor ratio of 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5, and 1. For example, the 6th floor bears 30%, the 5th floor bears 25%, and so on. Finally, the 2nd floor bears 10%, and the first floor does not bear any costs. Then, the compensation for the first floor should be based on the property price of the community where it is located. For example, the average price in Shenzhen is 50000 yuan, the floor area is 70 square meters, and the property price of 3.5 million yuan is compensated at 10% of 3.5 million yuan. That's 350000 yuan, which will be divided into 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5, and 1.
The above is a solution that I think is quite reasonable, and of course, many people have their own ideas. Feel free to leave a message for discussion! What if a high-rise resident offers a reasonable price that everyone thinks is reasonable, but the lower level residents are still unwilling? In other words, they just want to speak up loudly? I think there's nothing else we can do except to greet his 18th generation ancestors in our hearts. Of course, it doesn't count where you're going to throw tantrums and roll around, because the government has said that everyone must agree unless this regulation is lifted. Since the government has this regulation, it must have its own reasons. Fortunately, it didn't decide whether to press the elevator according to the voting ratio. This deserves praise from the government!
